Here's a piece of advice for all you aspiring filmmakers: never give your movie a title that could be used to insult it, because movie reviewers are beyond fucking lazy and they will take the easy way out every single time. The Forgotten, Monster Dog, Less Than Zero... these are all terrible names for movies, because you basically just did the critics' job for them. If they're gonna shit on your movie, at least make them work for it.

So, the broad in this flick is seeing a shrink because her kid died, but then the shrink throws her a curve ball: she never had a kid; she's just crazy. Okay, I see three ways they could go with this:

1. She really is nuts, which means that this movie was probably "inspired by actual events", premiered on Lifetime, and will almost certainly suck. Unless it deteriorates into utter hilarity, like this.

2. Her kid was real, but she's the victim of a gigantic conspiracy. If this is the case, it would have to involve dozens or possibly even hundreds of people, most of whom would have nothing whatsoever to gain from participating in the conspiracy. The very thought is beyond moronic any way you look at it. That doesn't entirely rule it out though.

3. Something supernatural is going on.

Fortunately they went with option three, and at first it's all pretty freaky, but by the end it's full-bore retarded, maxing out when people suddenly start flying off into outer space like they've become instantly immune to gravity. And frankly I found all the "unbreakable bond between a mother and her child" crap pretty fucking tiresome. It reminded me of the time I tried online dating, because every single mother's profile said the exact same thing: "I have three beautiful children who will ALWAYS come first!" Trust me, single mothers, you aren't fooling anybody. We all know that's code for "They all have different fathers."

Read Mr. Satanism's book, The 100 Best Movies Ever Made ...Mostly Suck, now available here and on Amazon.