"It's not going to be called Ghostbusters II. We'll burn in Hell before we call it Ghostbusters II." -Bill Murray, liar

Why is Ghostbusters II such a dumb piece of crap? The main reason is that it doesn't try to be a Part 2 at all. Instead of like continuing the story and showing us what happens next, it just wants to be the exact same movie as Part 1. The Ghostbusters were losers at the beginning of Part 1, so they're losers at the beginning of Part 2, never mind that that makes zero goddamned sense. Bill Murray was trying to bag Ripley in Part 1, so now they're broken up and he's trying to bag her again. A goofy dork got possessed in Part 1, so a goofy dork gets possessed again. There was a giant, crazy whatsit walking through the city at the end of Part 1, so even though it doesn't fit in with the rest of the story at all and is retarded almost beyond belief, they find a way to have a giant, crazy whatsit walk through the city again. You see what I mean? If this movie had its way, it would find the shit I took after I saw Part 1, add some butter, and sell it to me in a cardboard bucket so I could eat the same popcorn too. It's too bad, because there are a few funny lines and the whole "emotion slime" thing is a decent enough idea, but between the photocopied plot, all the boring bullshit involving that stupid fucking baby (I spent the entire movie waiting for someone to punt that damn crib ape into a cement wall), and the beyond embarrassing, cretinous halfshit where the Statue of Liberty comes to life, this flick manages to be just about the worst Part 2 in the history of ever (trumped only by this), and if you actually like it that just proves that you're so desperate for another one of these movies that you'll watch anything that says "Ghostbusters" on the cover, even if it isn't spelled right, was made in South America, and turns out to be a snuff video starring your sister. Fuck you, Ghostbusters II. May you rot in death hell forever.